- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- Studio Display XDR vs UltraSharp UP3221Q
Apple Studio Display XDR vs Dell UltraSharp UP3221Q
What Studio Display XDR does better (2) and where UltraSharp UP3221Q wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Screen7.9
Why is Studio Display XDR better than UltraSharp UP3221Q?
- Pixel density218 ppi vs 140 ppi+56%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
Why is UltraSharp UP3221Q better than Studio Display XDR?
- Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 31.5″ |
| Resolution | 5120 × 2880 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 5K | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 218 ppi | 140 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | Mini-LED (IPS) | Mini-LED (IPS) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 1,000 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Peak brightness (HDR) | 2,000 nits | — |
| Contrast ratio (static) | — | 1,300:1 |
| Response time | — | 8 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| Adobe RGB coverage | — | 93% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 99.8% |
| Rec. 2020 coverage | — | 83% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR 1000 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 96 W | — |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | — |
| HDMI inputs | — | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | — | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | — |
| Built-in webcam | Yes | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 6.3 kg | — |
| Width | 623 mm | — |
| Height | 362 mm | — |
| Depth | 33 mm | — |
| Product line | — | Dell UltraSharp |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ProArt PA27USDvsApple Studio Display XDR
9.59.7
vs
Asus ProArt PA32USDvsApple Studio Display XDR
9.09.7
vs
Dell UltraSharp U3226QvsApple Studio Display XDR
8.99.7
vs
Dell UltraSharp UP3221QvsLenovo ThinkVision Creator Extreme
8.89.4
vs
EIZO ColorEdge CG2700XvsDell UltraSharp UP3221Q
8.48.8
vs
Asus ProArt PA32UCGvsDell UltraSharp UP3221Q
7.68.8