How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA248QV vs ThinkVision P32p-20

Asus ProArt PA248QV vs Lenovo ThinkVision P32p-20

What ProArt PA248QV does better (2) and where ThinkVision P32p-20 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA248QV
Asus · 2020ProArt PA248QV
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ $180
vs
Lenovo ThinkVision P32p-20
Lenovo · 2020ThinkVision P32p-20
5.2Score
5 advantages
Higher score
2.5Screen4.7
3.0Colour accuracy3.1
8.0Design & ergonomics7.4

Why is ProArt PA248QV better than ThinkVision P32p-20?

  1. Refresh rate75 Hz vs 60 Hz+25%
  2. Response time5 ms vs 6 ms+20%

Why is ThinkVision P32p-20 better than ProArt PA248QV?

  1. Pixel density94 ppi vs 140 ppi+49%
  2. Colour depth8 bit vs 10 bit+25%
  3. Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 350 nits+17%
  4. Screen size24.1″ vs 31.5″+31%
  5. Height adjustment130 mm vs 135 mm+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size24.1″31.5″
Resolution1920 × 12003840 × 2160
Resolution classFull HD4K UHD
Pixel density94 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:1016:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate75 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)300 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms6 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%99%
DCI-P3 coverage—90%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 2—
Colour depth8 bit10 bit
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs11
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Ethernet (RJ45)—Yes
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm135 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight6.1 kg—
Width533 mm—
Height505 mm—
Depth211 mm—
Product lineASUS ProArtLenovo ThinkVision
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare