How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA27UCX vs ThinkVision P32p-20

Asus ProArt PA27UCX vs Lenovo ThinkVision P32p-20

What ProArt PA27UCX does better (4) and where ThinkVision P32p-20 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA27UCX
Asus · 2020ProArt PA27UCX
6.5Score
4 advantages≈ $1,350
Higher score
vs
Lenovo ThinkVision P32p-20
Lenovo · 2020ThinkVision P32p-20
5.2Score
3 advantages
6.2Screen4.7
7.3Colour accuracy3.1
6.2Connectivity3.9
3.3Design & ergonomics7.4

Why is ProArt PA27UCX better than ThinkVision P32p-20?

  1. Pixel density163 ppi vs 140 ppi+16%
  2. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  3. DCI-P3 coverage97% vs 90%+8%
  4. Response time4 ms vs 6 ms+50%

Why is ThinkVision P32p-20 better than ProArt PA27UCX?

  1. Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 350 nits+17%
  2. Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
  3. Height adjustment120 mm vs 135 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ProArt PA27UCXAsus ProArt PA27UCX≈ $1,3506.5
Display
Screen size27″31.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density163 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)300 nits350 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)1,000 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time4 ms6 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%99%
Adobe RGB coverage99.5%—
DCI-P3 coverage97%90%
Rec. 2020 coverage83%—
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 1—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
Hardware calibrationYes—
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W—
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Ethernet (RJ45)—Yes
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment120 mm135 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight11.5 kg—
Width625 mm—
Height544 mm—
Depth229 mm—
Product lineASUS ProArtLenovo ThinkVision
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare