- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- ProArt PA329CDV vs ColorEdge CG2400S
Asus ProArt PA329CDV vs EIZO ColorEdge CG2400S
What ProArt PA329CDV does better (8) and where ColorEdge CG2400S wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Screen3.4
8.9Colour accuracy5.9
7.3Connectivity3.2
6.6Design & ergonomics8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
ProArt PA329CDVColorEdge CG2400S
| ProArt PA329CDV | ColorEdge CG2400S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 607.2 mm | 408.1 mm | +199.1 mm |
| Width | 720.5 mm | 554.4 mm | +166.1 mm |
| Depth | 222 mm | 245 mm | −23 mm |
| Weight | 7 kg | 8.5 kg | −1.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ProArt PA329CDV better than ColorEdge CG2400S?
- Pixel density140 ppi vs 94 ppi+49%
- Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:1 vs 1,800:1833.3×
- Response time0.1 ms vs 11 ms110×
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 70 W+37%
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 61 Hz+97%
- Screen size31.5″ vs 24.1″+31%
- Weight7.05 kg vs 8.5 kg+21%
Why is ColorEdge CG2400S better than ProArt PA329CDV?
- Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 400 nits+33%
- Height adjustment130 mm vs 155 mm+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 31.5″ | 24.1″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | 140 ppi | 94 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 61 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 300 nits | 400 nits |
| Peak brightness (HDR) | 1,000 nits | — |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,500,000:1 | 1,800:1 |
| Response time | 0.1 ms | 11 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Adobe RGB coverage | — | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99% | 98% |
| Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) | ΔE 1.5 | — |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| Hardware calibration | — | Yes |
| Built-in calibration sensor | — | Yes |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Uniformity compensation | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 96 W | 70 W |
| KVM switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | No |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 130 mm | 155 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 7.05 kg | 8.5 kg |
| Width | 720 mm | 554 mm |
| Height | 607 mm | 408 mm |
| Depth | 222 mm | 245 mm |
| Product line | — | EIZO ColorEdge |
Related comparisons
vs
Asus ProArt PA329CDVvsApple Studio Display (2026)
9.19.6
vs
BenQ PD2730SvsAsus ProArt PA329CDV
9.09.1
vs
BenQ MA270SvsAsus ProArt PA329CDV
9.29.1
vs
BenQ MA320UGvsAsus ProArt PA329CDV
8.79.1
vs
BenQ PD2732UvsAsus ProArt PA329CDV
8.69.1
vs
EIZO ColorEdge CG2400SvsLenovo ThinkVision P40wd-40
6.06.3