How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32UCG vs UltraSharp UP2720QA

Asus ProArt PA32UCG vs Dell UltraSharp UP2720QA

What ProArt PA32UCG does better (6) and where UltraSharp UP2720QA wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32UCG
Asus · 2021ProArt PA32UCG
7.6Score
6 advantages≈ $3,000
vs
Dell UltraSharp UP2720QA
7.8Score
2 advantages≈ $1,600
Higher score
7.8Screen4.5
8.4Colour accuracy8.8
4.1Connectivity7.5
3.8Design & ergonomics5.8

Why is ProArt PA32UCG better than UltraSharp UP2720QA?

  1. Brightness (typical)1,000 nits vs 250 nits4×
  2. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
  3. HDMI inputs3 vs 2+50%
  4. Response time5 ms vs 6 ms+20%
  5. Screen size32″ vs 27″+19%
  6. Rec. 2020 coverage85% vs 80%+6%

Why is UltraSharp UP2720QA better than ProArt PA32UCG?

  1. Pixel density138 ppi vs 163 ppi+18%
  2. Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 1,300:1+30%
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ProArt PA32UCGAsus ProArt PA32UCG≈ $3,0007.6
Display
Screen size32″27″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density138 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate120 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)1,000 nits250 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)1,600 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,300:1
Response time5 ms6 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%—
Adobe RGB coverage99.5%100%
DCI-P3 coverage98%98%
Rec. 2020 coverage85%80%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 1—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
Hardware calibrationYes—
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)60 W—
ThunderboltYesYes
HDMI inputs32
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight14.64 kg—
Width727 mm—
Height600 mm—
Depth240 mm—
Product line—Dell UltraSharp
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare