- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- ProArt PA32UCG vs UltraSharp UP3221Q
Asus ProArt PA32UCG vs Dell UltraSharp UP3221Q
What ProArt PA32UCG does better (5) and where UltraSharp UP3221Q wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Screen7.9
8.4Colour accuracy6.5
Why is ProArt PA32UCG better than UltraSharp UP3221Q?
- Adobe RGB coverage99.5% vs 93%+7%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Response time5 ms vs 8 ms+60%
- HDMI inputs3 vs 2+50%
- Rec. 2020 coverage85% vs 83%+2%
Why is UltraSharp UP3221Q better than ProArt PA32UCG?
- Panel typeIPS vs Mini-LED (IPS)
- HDRHDR10 vs DisplayHDR 1000
- Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 1,300:1+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 32″ | 31.5″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 138 ppi | 140 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | Mini-LED (IPS) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 1,000 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Peak brightness (HDR) | 1,600 nits | — |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,300:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 8 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Adobe RGB coverage | 99.5% | 93% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 98% | 99.8% |
| Rec. 2020 coverage | 85% | 83% |
| Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed) | ΔE 1 | — |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| Hardware calibration | Yes | — |
| HDR | HDR10 | DisplayHDR 1000 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 60 W | — |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | — |
| HDMI inputs | 3 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 130 mm | — |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | — |
| Swivel | Yes | — |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 14.64 kg | — |
| Width | 727 mm | — |
| Height | 600 mm | — |
| Depth | 240 mm | — |
| Product line | — | Dell UltraSharp |
