How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32UCG vs ThinkVision Creator Extreme

Asus ProArt PA32UCG vs Lenovo ThinkVision Creator Extreme

What ProArt PA32UCG does better (4) and where ThinkVision Creator Extreme wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32UCG
Asus · 2021ProArt PA32UCG
7.6Score
4 advantages≈ $3,000
vs
Lenovo ThinkVision Creator Extreme
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ $3,000
Higher score
7.8Screen7.3
8.4Colour accuracy9.1
4.1Connectivity9.0

Why is ProArt PA32UCG better than ThinkVision Creator Extreme?

  1. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
  2. Response time5 ms vs 6 ms+20%
  3. Screen size32″ vs 27″+19%
  4. Rec. 2020 coverage85% vs 73%+16%

Why is ThinkVision Creator Extreme better than ProArt PA32UCG?

  1. Pixel density138 ppi vs 163 ppi+18%
  2. Panel typeIPS vs Mini-LED (IPS)
  3. HDRHDR10 vs DisplayHDR 1000
  4. Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 1,100:1+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ProArt PA32UCGAsus ProArt PA32UCG≈ $3,0007.6
Display
Screen size32″27″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density138 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSMini-LED (IPS)
Refresh rate120 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)1,000 nits—
Peak brightness (HDR)1,600 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,100:1
Response time5 ms6 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYes—
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
Adobe RGB coverage99.5%—
DCI-P3 coverage98%99.5%
Rec. 2020 coverage85%73%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 1—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
Hardware calibrationYes—
HDRHDR10DisplayHDR 1000
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)60 W—
ThunderboltYes—
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs33
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm—
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight14.64 kg—
Width727 mm—
Height600 mm—
Depth240 mm—
Product line—Lenovo ThinkVision
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare