How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32UCX vs ThinkVision P32p-20

Asus ProArt PA32UCX vs Lenovo ThinkVision P32p-20

What ProArt PA32UCX does better (5) and where ThinkVision P32p-20 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32UCX
Asus · 2020ProArt PA32UCX
7.8Score
5 advantages≈ $2,350
Higher score
vs
Lenovo ThinkVision P32p-20
Lenovo · 2020ThinkVision P32p-20
5.4Score
1 advantage
8.0Screen4.9
9.0Colour accuracy3.2
4.0Connectivity3.9
3.8Design & ergonomics7.5

Why is ProArt PA32UCX better than ThinkVision P32p-20?

  1. Brightness (typical)600 nits vs 350 nits+71%
  2. Contrast ratio (static)20,000:1 vs 1,000:120×
  3. HDMI inputs3 vs 13×
  4. DCI-P3 coverage99% vs 90%+10%
  5. Response time5 ms vs 6 ms+20%

Why is ThinkVision P32p-20 better than ProArt PA32UCX?

  1. Height adjustment130 mm vs 135 mm+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ProArt PA32UCXAsus ProArt PA32UCX≈ $2,3507.8
Display
Screen size32″31.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density138 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)600 nits350 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)1,200 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)20,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms6 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%99%
Adobe RGB coverage99.5%—
DCI-P3 coverage99%90%
Rec. 2020 coverage89%—
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)ΔE 1—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
Hardware calibrationYes—
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)60 W—
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs31
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Ethernet (RJ45)—Yes
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment130 mm135 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight14 kg—
Width727 mm—
Height600 mm—
Depth240 mm—
Product lineASUS ProArtLenovo ThinkVision
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare