- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- MA270S vs PD2730S
BenQ MA270S vs BenQ PD2730S
What MA270S does better (3) and where PD2730S wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
MA270SPD2730S
| MA270S | PD2730S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 580 mm | 578 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 614 mm | 614 mm | = |
| Depth | 220 mm | 242 mm | −22 mm |
| Weight | 8.6 kg | 8.3 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MA270S better than PD2730S?
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Brightness (typical)450 nits vs 400 nits+12%
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 90 W+7%
Why is PD2730S better than MA270S?
- Anti-glare / matte screenNo · MA270S: Yes
- Refresh rate70 Hz vs 76 Hz+9%
- Weight8.64 kg vs 8.3 kg+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 5120 × 2880 | 5120 × 2880 |
| Resolution class | 5K | 5K |
| Pixel density | 218 ppi | 218 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 70 Hz | 76 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 450 nits | 400 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 2,000:1 | 2,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | No | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 99% | 100% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99% | 98% |
| Colour depth | — | 10 bit |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 96 W | 90 W |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | Yes |
| KVM switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | — | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Daisy chain (DP MST) | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 150 mm | 150 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 8.64 kg | 8.3 kg |
| Width | 614 mm | 614 mm |
| Height | 580 mm | 578 mm |
| Depth | 220 mm | 242 mm |
| Product line | BenQ MA | BenQ PD |
