- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- MA270U vs PD2705UA
BenQ MA270U vs BenQ PD2705UA
What MA270U does better (6) and where PD2705UA wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
MA270UPD2705UA
| MA270U | PD2705UA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 560 mm | 703 mm | −143 mm |
| Width | 614 mm | 614 mm | = |
| Depth | 220 mm | 459 mm | −239 mm |
| Weight | 8.2 kg | 10 kg | −1.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MA270U better than PD2705UA?
- Brightness (typical)400 nits vs 250 nits+60%
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W vs 65 W+38%
- HDRDisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Refresh rate76 Hz vs 60 Hz+27%
- Weight8.2 kg vs 10 kg+22%
Why is PD2705UA better than MA270U?
PD2705UA has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 163 ppi | 163 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 76 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 400 nits | 250 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,200:1 | 1,200:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 99% | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 95% | — |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | — |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 90 W | 65 W |
| KVM switch | — | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | — | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 115 mm | — |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | — |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | — |
| Weight | 8.2 kg | 10 kg |
| Width | 614 mm | 614 mm |
| Height | 560 mm | 703 mm |
| Depth | 220 mm | 459 mm |
| Product line | BenQ MA | — |
