How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. MA320U vs SW272Q

BenQ MA320U vs BenQ SW272Q

What MA320U does better (6) and where SW272Q wins (2) — every spec side by side.

BenQ MA320U
BenQ · 2024MA320U
7.4Score
6 advantages≈ $640
Higher score
vs
BenQ SW272Q
BenQ · 2023SW272Q
5.9Score
2 advantages≈ $670
8.5Screen2.8
6.1Colour accuracy5.5
6.8Connectivity6.2
4.0Design & ergonomics6.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

MA320USW272Q
714 × 609220614 × 592274
MA320USW272QDifference
Height609 mm592 mm+17 mm
Width714 mm614 mm+100 mm
Depth220 mm274 mm−54 mm
Weight9.1 kg8.3 kg+0.8 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MA320U better than SW272Q?

  1. Brightness (typical)550 nits vs 300 nits+83%
  2. Pixel density140 ppi vs 109 ppi+28%
  3. HDRDisplayHDR 600 vs HDR10
  4. Contrast ratio (static)1,300:1 vs 1,000:1+30%
  5. Refresh rate76 Hz vs 60 Hz+27%
  6. Screen size31.5″ vs 27″+17%

Why is SW272Q better than MA320U?

  1. Height adjustment115 mm vs 140 mm+22%
  2. Weight9.1 kg vs 8.3 kg+10%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ MA320UBenQ MA320U≈ $6407.4
BenQ SW272QBenQ SW272Q≈ $6705.9
Display
Screen size31.5″27″
Resolution3840 × 21602560 × 1440
Resolution class4K UHDQHD / 2.5K
Pixel density140 ppi109 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate76 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)550 nits300 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)600 nits—
Contrast ratio (static)1,300:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage99%100%
Adobe RGB coverage—99%
DCI-P3 coverage97%98%
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRDisplayHDR 600HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)90 W90 W
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment115 mm140 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight9.1 kg8.3 kg
Width714 mm614 mm
Height609 mm592 mm
Depth220 mm274 mm
Product lineBenQ MA—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare