- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD2705UA vs PD2706U
BenQ PD2705UA vs BenQ PD2706U
What PD2705UA does better (0) and where PD2706U wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD2705UAPD2706U
| PD2705UA | PD2706U | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 703 mm | 561 mm | +142 mm |
| Width | 614 mm | 614 mm | = |
| Depth | 459 mm | 238 mm | +221 mm |
| Weight | 10 kg | 8.3 kg | +1.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD2705UA better than PD2706U?
PD2705UA has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is PD2706U better than PD2705UA?
- Brightness (typical)250 nits vs 350 nits+40%
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)65 W vs 90 W+38%
- HDRHDR10 vs DisplayHDR 400
- Weight10 kg vs 8.3 kg+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 163 ppi | 163 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 250 nits | 350 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,200:1 | 1,200:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 99% | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 95% |
| HDR | HDR10 | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 65 W | 90 W |
| KVM switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | — | 110 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | — | Yes |
| VESA mount | — | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 10 kg | 8.3 kg |
| Width | 614 mm | 614 mm |
| Height | 703 mm | 561 mm |
| Depth | 459 mm | 238 mm |
