How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. PD3220U vs ColorEdge CS2740

BenQ PD3220U vs EIZO ColorEdge CS2740

What PD3220U does better (3) and where ColorEdge CS2740 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

BenQ PD3220U
BenQ · 2019PD3220U
5.3Score
3 advantages≈ $990
vs
EIZO ColorEdge CS2740
EIZO · 2019ColorEdge CS2740
6.6Score
3 advantages≈ $1,150
Higher score
4.8Screen5.9
4.4Colour accuracy7.9
7.5Connectivity2.3
3.6Design & ergonomics6.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

PD3220UColorEdge CS2740
715 × 628186638 × 404.1265
PD3220UColorEdge CS2740Difference
Height628 mm404.1 mm+223.9 mm
Width715 mm638 mm+77 mm
Depth186 mm265 mm−79 mm
Weight10.4 kg10.3 kg+0.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PD3220U better than ColorEdge CS2740?

  1. Response time5 ms vs 10 ms2×
  2. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  3. Screen size31.5″ vs 26.9″+17%

Why is ColorEdge CS2740 better than PD3220U?

  1. Pixel density140 ppi vs 164 ppi+17%
  2. Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 350 nits+17%
  3. DCI-P3 coverage95% vs 99%+4%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD3220UBenQ PD3220U≈ $9905.3
Display
Screen size31.5″26.9″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density140 ppi164 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Brightness (typical)300 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms10 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
Adobe RGB coverage—99%
DCI-P3 coverage95%99%
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDRHDR10—
Uniformity compensation—Yes
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)—60 W
ThunderboltYes—
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesNo
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—155 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
Swivel—Yes
VESA mount—100 × 100 mm
Weight10.4 kg10.3 kg
Width715 mm638 mm
Height628 mm404 mm
Depth186 mm265 mm
Product line—EIZO ColorEdge
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare