How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. PD3220U vs UltraFine 40WP95C

BenQ PD3220U vs LG UltraFine 40WP95C

What PD3220U does better (1) and where UltraFine 40WP95C wins (2) — every spec side by side.

BenQ PD3220U
BenQ · 2019PD3220U
5.3Score
1 advantage≈ $990
Higher score
vs
LG UltraFine 40WP95C
5.1Score
2 advantages≈ $1,150
4.8Screen5.8
7.5Connectivity9.2
3.6Design & ergonomics2.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

PD3220UUltraFine 40WP95C
715 × 628186947 × 615283
PD3220UUltraFine 40WP95CDifference
Height628 mm615 mm+13 mm
Width715 mm947 mm−232 mm
Depth186 mm283 mm−97 mm
Weight10.4 kg12.3 kg−1.9 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PD3220U better than UltraFine 40WP95C?

  1. Weight10.4 kg vs 12.3 kg+18%

Why is UltraFine 40WP95C better than PD3220U?

  1. DCI-P3 coverage95% vs 98%+3%
  2. Screen size31.5″ vs 39.7″+26%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD3220UBenQ PD3220U≈ $9905.3
Display
Screen size31.5″39.7″
Resolution3840 × 21605120 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD5K
Pixel density140 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:921:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate—72 Hz
Brightness (typical)300 nits300 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Curved screen—Yes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%—
DCI-P3 coverage95%98%
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRHDR10HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)—96 W
ThunderboltYesYes
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—110 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
Swivel—Yes
Weight10.4 kg12.3 kg
Width715 mm947 mm
Height628 mm615 mm
Depth186 mm283 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare