How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. PD3220U vs VP2786-4K

BenQ PD3220U vs ViewSonic VP2786-4K

What PD3220U does better (1) and where VP2786-4K wins (5) — every spec side by side.

BenQ PD3220U
BenQ · 2019PD3220U
5.3Score
1 advantage≈ $990
vs
ViewSonic VP2786-4K
ViewSonic · 2022VP2786-4K
8.0Score
5 advantages≈ $1,000
Higher score
4.8Screen7.4
4.4Colour accuracy7.2
7.5Connectivity6.5
3.6Design & ergonomics5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

PD3220UVP2786-4K
715 × 628186613 × 449.1232
PD3220UVP2786-4KDifference
Height628 mm449.1 mm+178.9 mm
Width715 mm613 mm+102 mm
Depth186 mm232 mm−46 mm
Weight10.4 kg8.3 kg+2.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PD3220U better than VP2786-4K?

  1. Screen size31.5″ vs 27″+17%

Why is VP2786-4K better than PD3220U?

  1. Pixel density140 ppi vs 163 ppi+16%
  2. Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 350 nits+17%
  3. DCI-P3 coverage95% vs 98%+3%
  4. Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 1,300:1+30%
  5. Weight10.4 kg vs 8.3 kg+25%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD3220UBenQ PD3220U≈ $9905.3
ViewSonic VP2786-4KViewSonic VP2786-4K≈ $1,0008.0
Display
Screen size31.5″27″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density140 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Brightness (typical)300 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,300:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%—
Adobe RGB coverage—100%
DCI-P3 coverage95%98%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)—ΔE 2
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
Hardware calibration—Yes
Factory calibrated (report)—Yes
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)—90 W
ThunderboltYes—
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYes—
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
Swivel—Yes
Weight10.4 kg8.3 kg
Width715 mm613 mm
Height628 mm449 mm
Depth186 mm232 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare