- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD1220 vs WH851
GAOMON PD1220 vs GAOMON WH851
What PD1220 does better (0) and where WH851 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD1220WH851
| PD1220 | WH851 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 144 mm | 171 mm | −27 mm |
| Width | 256 mm | 289 mm | −33 mm |
| Depth | 4.5 mm | 7.8 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Weight | 0.7 kg | 0.4 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD1220 better than WH851?
PD1220 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is WH851 better than PD1220?
- Pressure levels8,192 vs 16,3842×
- Wireless connectionNo · PD1220: Yes
- Report rate220 RPS vs 300 RPS+36%
- Weight0.74 kg vs 0.39 kg+90%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | — |
| Resolution class | Full HD | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness (typical) | 220 nits | — |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | — |
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 8,192 | 16,384 |
| Tilt recognition | ±60° | ±60° |
| Active area | — | 203 × 127 mm |
| Active area width | — | 203 mm |
| Active area height | — | 127 mm |
| Active area (surface) | — | 258 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 5,080 lpi | 5,080 lpi |
| Report rate | 220 RPS | 300 RPS |
| Pen accuracy (centre) | — | ±0.3 mm |
| Battery-free pen | — | Yes |
| Express keys | — | 8 |
| Multi-touch | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | No | — |
| HDMI inputs | 1 | — |
| Wireless connection | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Compatibility | Windows, macOS, Android | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, ChromeOS |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 0.74 kg | 0.39 kg |
| Width | 256 mm | 289 mm |
| Height | 144 mm | 171 mm |
| Depth | 4 mm | 8 mm |
