- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- DTU-1141B vs One 13
Wacom DTU-1141B vs Wacom One 13
What DTU-1141B does better (2) and where One 13 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
DTU-1141BOne 13
| DTU-1141B | One 13 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 210 mm | 225 mm | −15 mm |
| Width | 283 mm | 357 mm | −74 mm |
| Weight | 0.8 kg | 1 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is DTU-1141B better than One 13?
- Weight0.8 kg vs 1 kg+25%
- Response time25 ms vs 26 ms+4%
Why is One 13 better than DTU-1141B?
- Pressure levels1,024 vs 4,0964×
- Pen accuracy (centre)±0.5 mm vs ±0.01 mm50×
- Active area (surface)280 cm² vs 488 cm²+74%
- Screen size10.1″ vs 13.3″+32%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 13.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1080 |
| Resolution class | Full HD | Full HD |
| Pixel density | — | 166 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Brightness (typical) | 200 nits | 200 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | — | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 25 ms | 26 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | — | Yes |
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 1,024 | 4,096 |
| Tilt recognition | — | ±60° |
| Active area | 223.2 × 125.6 mm | 294 × 166 mm |
| Active area width | 223 mm | 294 mm |
| Active area height | 126 mm | 166 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 280 cm² | 488 cm² |
| Pen resolution | 2,540 lpi | 2,540 lpi |
| Pen accuracy (centre) | ±0.5 mm | ±0.01 mm |
| Battery-free pen | — | Yes |
| Multi-touch | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | — | No |
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| Wireless connection | No | No |
| Compatibility | — | Windows, Android, ChromeOS |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 0.8 kg | 1 kg |
| Width | 283 mm | 357 mm |
| Height | 210 mm | 225 mm |
| Depth | 11 mm | — |
| Product line | — | Wacom One |
