How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. DTU-1141B vs Pen Display 16

Wacom DTU-1141B vs Xencelabs Pen Display 16

What DTU-1141B does better (1) and where Pen Display 16 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Wacom DTU-1141B
Wacom · 2020DTU-1141B
3.7Score
1 advantage≈ $580
vs
Xencelabs Pen Display 16
Xencelabs · 2024Pen Display 16
9.5Score
5 advantages≈ $540
Higher score
2.1Screen9.7
2.0Pen & controls4.2
4.4Connectivity7.9
8.7Design & ergonomics7.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

DTU-1141BPen Display 16
283 × 21011410 × 25912
DTU-1141BPen Display 16Difference
Height210 mm259 mm−49 mm
Width283 mm410 mm−127 mm
Depth11 mm12 mm−1 mm
Weight0.8 kg1.2 kg−0.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is DTU-1141B better than Pen Display 16?

  1. Weight0.8 kg vs 1.21 kg+51%

Why is Pen Display 16 better than DTU-1141B?

  1. Pressure levels1,024 vs 8,1928×
  2. Brightness (typical)200 nits vs 300 nits+50%
  3. Active area (surface)280 cm² vs 666 cm²2.4×
  4. Pen resolution2,540 lpi vs 5,080 lpi2×
  5. Screen size10.1″ vs 15.5″+53%
Specifications

Side by side

Wacom DTU-1141BWacom DTU-1141B≈ $5803.7
Display
Screen size10.1″15.5″
Resolution1920 × 10803840 × 2160
Resolution classFull HD4K UHD
Pixel density—259 ppi
Aspect ratio16:9—
Panel type—OLED
Brightness (typical)200 nits300 nits
Contrast ratio (static)—100,000:1
Response time25 ms—
Anti-glare / matte screen—Yes
Pen & controls
Pressure levels1,0248,192
Tilt recognition—±60°
Active area223.2 × 125.6 mm344.2 × 193.6 mm
Active area width223 mm344 mm
Active area height126 mm194 mm
Active area (surface)280 cm²666 cm²
Pen resolution2,540 lpi5,080 lpi
Pen accuracy (centre)±0.5 mm—
Battery-free pen—Yes
Pen with eraser—Yes
Multi-touchNoNo
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)—Yes
Wireless connectionNoNo
Compatibility—Windows, macOS
Design & ergonomics
Weight0.8 kg1.21 kg
Width283 mm410 mm
Height210 mm259 mm
Depth11 mm12 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare