7% cheaper ≈ $1,000
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 450 nits
- Pixel density 166 ppi vs 218 ppi
Alternatives to BenQ MA270S
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the MA270S — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the MA270S
9% pricier ≈ $1,200
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 218 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 450 nits
48% pricier ≈ $1,600
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 450 nits
- Anti-glare / matte screen
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 70 Hz
44% pricier ≈ $1,550
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 70 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 218 ppi
- Swivel
33% pricier ≈ $1,450
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 70 Hz
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 450 nits
- Pixel density 166 ppi vs 218 ppi
15% cheaper ≈ $920
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 70 Hz
- Screen size 31.5″ vs 27″
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 218 ppi
- Weight 9.64 kg vs 8.64 kg
8% pricier ≈ $1,150
- Anti-glare / matte screen
- Refresh rate 76 Hz vs 70 Hz
- Weight 8.3 kg vs 8.64 kg
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 450 nits
17% cheaper ≈ $900
- Anti-glare / matte screen
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 218 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
17% cheaper ≈ $900
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 96 W
- Anti-glare / matte screen
- HDR DisplayHDR 600 vs DisplayHDR 400
- Pixel density 140 ppi vs 218 ppi
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
42% cheaper ≈ $630
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 96 W
- Anti-glare / matte screen
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 70 Hz
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 218 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 450 nits