9% cheaper ≈ $2,200
- Pixel density 166 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Weight 5.36 kg vs 9.84 kg
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 0.03 ms
Alternatives to Dell UltraSharp U3226Q
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the UltraSharp U3226Q — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the UltraSharp U3226Q
27% pricier ≈ $3,100
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Weight 6.96 kg vs 9.84 kg
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 0.03 ms
36% cheaper ≈ $1,550
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Rec. 2020 coverage 99% vs 80%
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 0.03 ms
5% pricier ≈ $2,500
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 300 nits
- DisplayPort inputs 2 vs 1
- Screen size 51.5″ vs 31.5″
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,500,000:1
- Response time 8 ms vs 0.03 ms
31% pricier ≈ $3,200
- Brightness (typical) 1,000 nits vs 300 nits
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Weight 6.3 kg vs 9.84 kg
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Panel type Mini-LED (IPS) vs OLED
34% cheaper ≈ $1,600
- Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 300 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
41% cheaper ≈ $1,450
- Pixel density 166 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Weight 7.2 kg vs 9.84 kg
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 0.03 ms
31% cheaper ≈ $1,650
- Pixel density 224 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 300 nits
- Adobe RGB coverage 99.5% vs 94%
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,500,000:1
51% cheaper ≈ $1,200
- Weight 7.05 kg vs 9.84 kg
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 140 W
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 0.03 ms
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
- Adobe RGB coverage 100% vs 94%
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 300 nits
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 140 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,300:1 vs 1,500,000:1