Alternatives to GAOMON PD1320
10 pen displays at a similar price that compete with the PD1320 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the PD1320
23% cheaper ≈ $170
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Pixel density 190 ppi vs 166 ppi
- Weight 0.76 kg vs 0.88 kg
- Active area (surface) 370 cm² vs 485 cm²
- Screen size 11.6″ vs 13.3″
14% pricier ≈ $250
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Active area (surface) 655 cm² vs 485 cm²
- Pixel density 143 ppi vs 166 ppi
- Weight 1.28 kg vs 0.88 kg
5% cheaper ≈ $210
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Report rate 266 RPS vs 220 RPS
- Weight 0.98 kg vs 0.88 kg
5% pricier ≈ $230
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Report rate 300 RPS vs 220 RPS
- Pixel density 142 ppi vs 166 ppi
- Weight 1.58 kg vs 0.88 kg
32% cheaper ≈ $150
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Pixel density 190 ppi vs 166 ppi
- Weight 0.74 kg vs 0.88 kg
- Brightness (typical) 200 nits vs 220 nits
- Active area (surface) 370 cm² vs 485 cm²
46% pricier ≈ $320
- Pixel density 266 ppi vs 166 ppi
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Report rate 300 RPS vs 220 RPS
- Weight 1 kg vs 0.88 kg
5% pricier ≈ $230
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Report rate 260 RPS vs 220 RPS
32% pricier ≈ $290
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Brightness (typical) 270 nits vs 220 nits
- Pixel density 142 ppi vs 166 ppi
- Weight 1.35 kg vs 0.88 kg
32% pricier ≈ $290
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Active area (surface) 667 cm² vs 485 cm²
- Screen size 15.5″ vs 13.3″
- Pixel density 142 ppi vs 166 ppi
- Weight 1.3 kg vs 0.88 kg