How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Displays & pen tablets
  3. Lenovo ThinkVision P40wd-40
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Lenovo ThinkVision P40wd-40

10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the ThinkVision P40wd-40 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Alternatives to the ThinkVision P40wd-40

Asus ProArt PA329CDV
1
Asus · 2026ProArt PA329CDV
9.1
4% pricier ≈ $1,200
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 15 W
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • Response time 0.1 ms vs 4 ms
  • Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 400 nits
  • Screen size 31.5″ vs 39.7″
BenQ MA270S
2
BenQ · 2026MA270S
9.2
5% cheaper ≈ $1,100
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 15 W
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
  • Anti-glare / matte screen
  • Refresh rate 70 Hz vs 120 Hz
ViewSonic VP3276T-4K
3
ViewSonic · 2026VP3276T-4K
7.0
30% cheaper ≈ $800
  • HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
  • Pivot (portrait rotation)
  • Weight 7.8 kg vs 13.5 kg
  • Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Height adjustment 120 mm vs 155 mm
BenQ MA320UG
4
BenQ · 2026MA320UG
8.7
19% cheaper ≈ $920
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 15 W
  • HDR DisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
  • HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
  • Anti-glare / matte screen
  • Screen size 31.5″ vs 39.7″
ViewSonic VP2788-5K
5
ViewSonic · 2026VP2788-5K
7.3
26% cheaper ≈ $840
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Weight 6.4 kg vs 13.5 kg
  • Brightness (typical) 500 nits vs 400 nits
  • Response time 14 ms vs 4 ms
  • Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
Asus ProArt PA279CDV
6
Asus · 2026ProArt PA279CDV
9.4
12% cheaper ≈ $1,000
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 15 W
  • Pixel density 166 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
  • Screen size 26.5″ vs 39.7″
BenQ PD2732U
7
BenQ · 2026PD2732U
8.6
21% cheaper ≈ $900
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 15 W
  • Pixel density 163 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Pivot (portrait rotation)
  • Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR
8
Asus · 2026ProArt PA32UCDMR
9.3
37% pricier ≈ $1,550
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 15 W
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • Response time 0.1 ms vs 4 ms
  • Swivel
  • Screen size 31.5″ vs 39.7″
Asus ProArt PA32UCE
9
Asus · 2025ProArt PA32UCE
7.9
5% cheaper ≈ $1,100
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 15 W
  • Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 400 nits
  • HDMI inputs 2 vs 1
  • Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
Asus ProArt PA27UCDMR
10
Asus · 2026ProArt PA27UCDMR
8.9
26% pricier ≈ $1,450
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 15 W
  • Pixel density 166 ppi vs 140 ppi
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
  • Swivel
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare