11% cheaper ≈ $1,000
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Pixel density 185 ppi vs 142 ppi
- Response time 10 ms vs 25 ms
- Weight 6.3 kg vs 1.9 kg
Alternatives to Wacom DTK-1660E
10 pen displays at a similar price that compete with the DTK-1660E — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the DTK-1660E
18% cheaper ≈ $930
- Response time 8 ms vs 25 ms
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 210 nits
- Active area (surface) 1,278 cm² vs 666 cm²
- Pixel density 102 ppi vs 142 ppi
- Weight 4.5 kg vs 1.9 kg
52% pricier ≈ $1,750
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Wireless connection
- Brightness (typical) 400 nits vs 210 nits
18% pricier ≈ $1,350
- Pixel density 185 ppi vs 142 ppi
- Brightness (typical) 330 nits vs 210 nits
- Active area (surface) 1,563 cm² vs 666 cm²
- Weight 6 kg vs 1.9 kg
6% cheaper ≈ $1,050
- Multi-touch
- Active area (surface) 1,276 cm² vs 666 cm²
- Screen size 21.5″ vs 15.5″
- Pixel density 102 ppi vs 142 ppi
- Weight 5.6 kg vs 1.9 kg
- Pixel density 166 ppi vs 142 ppi
- Pen accuracy (centre) ±0.01 mm vs ±0.5 mm
- Weight 1 kg vs 1.9 kg
- Pressure levels 4,096 vs 8,192
- Brightness (typical) 200 nits vs 210 nits
- Brightness (typical) 220 nits vs 210 nits
- Weight 1.32 kg vs 1.9 kg
40% cheaper ≈ $680
- Pixel density 282 ppi vs 142 ppi
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Pen accuracy (centre) ±0.3 mm vs ±0.5 mm
- Brightness (typical) 200 nits vs 210 nits
5% pricier ≈ $1,200
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 210 nits
- Active area (surface) 1,560 cm² vs 666 cm²
- Pixel density 123 ppi vs 142 ppi
- Weight 4.8 kg vs 1.9 kg
26% cheaper ≈ $840
- Pixel density 238 ppi vs 142 ppi
- Pressure levels 16,384 vs 8,192
- USB-C video input (one cable)
- Weight 2 kg vs 1.9 kg