How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. Studio Display (2026) vs ProArt PA27UCGE

Apple Studio Display (2026) vs Asus ProArt PA27UCGE

What Studio Display (2026) does better (2) and where ProArt PA27UCGE wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Apple Studio Display (2026)
9.6Score
2 advantages≈ $1,600
Higher score
vs
Asus ProArt PA27UCGE
Asus · 2025ProArt PA27UCGE
9.2Score
1 advantage≈ $770
9.5Screen9.4
8.8Connectivity9.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Studio Display (2026)ProArt PA27UCGE
623 × 36231612.4 × 574.7201.8
Studio Display (2026)ProArt PA27UCGEDifference
Height362 mm574.7 mm−212.7 mm
Width623 mm612.4 mm+10.6 mm
Depth31 mm201.8 mm−170.8 mm
Weight5.4 kg6.4 kg−1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Studio Display (2026) better than ProArt PA27UCGE?

  1. Pixel density218 ppi vs 163 ppi+34%
  2. Weight5.4 kg vs 6.4 kg+19%

Why is ProArt PA27UCGE better than Studio Display (2026)?

  1. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 160 Hz2.7×
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size27″27″
Resolution5120 × 28803840 × 2160
Resolution class5K4K UHD
Pixel density218 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz160 Hz
Brightness (typical)600 nits600 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)—600 nits
Contrast ratio (static)—1,000:1
Response time—1 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage—100%
DCI-P3 coverage—98%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)—ΔE 1
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
Hardware calibration—Yes
HDR—HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W96 W
ThunderboltYes—
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs—2
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hubYesYes
Daisy chain (DP MST)Yes—
Built-in speakersYesYes
Built-in webcamYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—120 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)—Yes
Swivel—Yes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight5.4 kg6.4 kg
Width623 mm612 mm
Height362 mm575 mm
Depth31 mm202 mm
Product line—ASUS ProArt
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare