How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. Studio Display (2026) vs SW272U

Apple Studio Display (2026) vs BenQ SW272U

What Studio Display (2026) does better (4) and where SW272U wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Apple Studio Display (2026)
9.6Score
4 advantages≈ $1,600
Higher score
vs
BenQ SW272U
BenQ · 2024SW272U
8.4Score
0 advantages≈ $1,400
9.5Screen7.2
8.8Connectivity6.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Studio Display (2026)SW272U
623 × 36231614 × 592274
Studio Display (2026)SW272UDifference
Height362 mm592 mm−230 mm
Width623 mm614 mm+9 mm
Depth31 mm274 mm−243 mm
Weight5.4 kg8.6 kg−3.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Studio Display (2026) better than SW272U?

  1. Pixel density218 ppi vs 163 ppi+34%
  2. Brightness (typical)600 nits vs 400 nits+50%
  3. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 90 W+7%
  4. Weight5.4 kg vs 8.6 kg+59%

Why is SW272U better than Studio Display (2026)?

SW272U has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

BenQ SW272UBenQ SW272U≈ $1,4008.4
Display
Screen size27″27″
Resolution5120 × 28803840 × 2160
Resolution class5K4K UHD
Pixel density218 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)600 nits400 nits
Contrast ratio (static)—1,000:1
Response time—5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage—100%
Adobe RGB coverage—99%
DCI-P3 coverage—99%
Colour depth10 bit—
HDR—HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W90 W
ThunderboltYes—
HDMI inputs—2
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hubYesYes
Daisy chain (DP MST)Yes—
Built-in speakersYes—
Built-in webcamYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—140 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)—Yes
Swivel—Yes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight5.4 kg8.6 kg
Width623 mm614 mm
Height362 mm592 mm
Depth31 mm274 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare