How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. Studio Display (2026) vs UltraSharp U4025QW

Apple Studio Display (2026) vs Dell UltraSharp U4025QW

What Studio Display (2026) does better (2) and where UltraSharp U4025QW wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Apple Studio Display (2026)
9.6Score
2 advantages≈ $1,600
Higher score
vs
Dell UltraSharp U4025QW
Dell · 2024UltraSharp U4025QW
8.8Score
3 advantages≈ $1,700
9.6Screen8.7
9.1Connectivity7.8

Why is Studio Display (2026) better than UltraSharp U4025QW?

  1. Pixel density218 ppi vs 139 ppi+57%
  2. Brightness (typical)600 nits vs 450 nits+33%

Why is UltraSharp U4025QW better than Studio Display (2026)?

  1. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 140 W+46%
  2. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
  3. Screen size27″ vs 40″+48%
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size27″40″
Resolution5120 × 28805120 × 2160
Resolution class5K5K
Pixel density218 ppi139 ppi
Aspect ratio16:921:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz120 Hz
Brightness (typical)600 nits450 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)—600 nits
Contrast ratio (static)—2,000:1
Response time—5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Curved screen—Yes
Colour
sRGB coverage—100%
DCI-P3 coverage—99%
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDR—DisplayHDR 600
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W140 W
ThunderboltYesYes
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs—1
DisplayPort inputs—1
USB hub—Yes
Ethernet (RJ45)—Yes
Daisy chain (DP MST)YesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Built-in webcamYes—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—150 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)—No
Swivel—Yes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight—12.22 kg
Width—947 mm
Height—622 mm
Depth—253 mm
Product line—Dell UltraSharp
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare