- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- Studio Display vs MA270S
Apple Studio Display vs BenQ MA270S
What Studio Display does better (3) and where MA270S wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Screen9.0
5.3Connectivity8.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Studio DisplayMA270S
| Studio Display | MA270S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 362 mm | 580 mm | −218 mm |
| Width | 623 mm | 614 mm | +9 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 220 mm | −189 mm |
| Weight | 6.3 kg | 8.6 kg | −2.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Studio Display better than MA270S?
- Brightness (typical)600 nits vs 450 nits+33%
- Anti-glare / matte screenYes · MA270S: No
- Weight6.3 kg vs 8.64 kg+37%
Why is MA270S better than Studio Display?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 70 Hz+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 5120 × 2880 | 5120 × 2880 |
| Resolution class | 5K | 5K |
| Pixel density | 218 ppi | 218 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 70 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 600 nits | 450 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | — | 2,000:1 |
| Response time | — | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | No |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | — | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 99% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | — |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR 400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | 96 W |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | Yes |
| KVM switch | — | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | — | 2 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Daisy chain (DP MST) | — | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in webcam | Yes | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | — | 150 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | — | Yes |
| Swivel | — | Yes |
| VESA mount | — | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 6.3 kg | 8.64 kg |
| Width | 623 mm | 614 mm |
| Height | 362 mm | 580 mm |
| Depth | 31 mm | 220 mm |
| Product line | — | BenQ MA |
