How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32UCDMR vs PD2730S

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR vs BenQ PD2730S

What ProArt PA32UCDMR does better (8) and where PD2730S wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR
Asus · 2026ProArt PA32UCDMR
9.3Score
8 advantages≈ $1,550
Higher score
vs
BenQ PD2730S
BenQ · 2025PD2730S
9.0Score
2 advantages≈ $1,150
9.7Screen9.4
9.6Colour accuracy8.3
9.2Connectivity4.9
2.6Design & ergonomics7.9

Why is ProArt PA32UCDMR better than PD2730S?

  1. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 76 Hz3.2×
  2. Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1750×
  3. Response time0.1 ms vs 5 ms50×
  4. Panel typeOLED vs IPS
  5. HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400 vs DisplayHDR 400
  6. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  7. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 90 W+7%
  8. Screen size31.5″ vs 27″+17%

Why is PD2730S better than ProArt PA32UCDMR?

  1. Pixel density140 ppi vs 218 ppi+56%
  2. SwivelNo · ProArt PA32UCDMR: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD2730SBenQ PD2730S≈ $1,1509.0
Display
Screen size31.5″27″
Resolution3840 × 21605120 × 2880
Resolution class4K UHD5K
Pixel density140 ppi218 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeOLEDIPS
Refresh rate240 Hz76 Hz
Brightness (typical)—400 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:12,000:1
Response time0.1 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
DCI-P3 coverage99%98%
Rec. 2020 coverage99%—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400DisplayHDR 400
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W90 W
ThunderboltYesYes
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Daisy chain (DP MST)—Yes
Built-in speakers—Yes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—150 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelNoYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight—8.3 kg
Width—614 mm
Height—578 mm
Depth—242 mm
Product lineASUS ProArtBenQ PD
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare