- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD2725U vs PD2732U
BenQ PD2725U vs BenQ PD2732U
What PD2725U does better (5) and where PD2732U wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD2725UPD2732U
| PD2725U | PD2732U | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 600 mm | 545 mm | +55 mm |
| Width | 615 mm | 614 mm | +1 mm |
| Depth | 273 mm | 242 mm | +31 mm |
| Weight | 8.3 kg | 8.6 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD2725U better than PD2732U?
- HDRDisplayHDR 400 vs HDR10
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Height adjustment150 mm vs 115 mm+30%
- Contrast ratio (static)1,200:1 vs 1,000:1+20%
- Weight8.3 kg vs 8.56 kg+3%
Why is PD2732U better than PD2725U?
- Brightness (typical)250 nits vs 400 nits+60%
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)65 W vs 90 W+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 163 ppi | 163 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 250 nits | 400 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,200:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| Adobe RGB coverage | — | 100% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 99% |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 65 W | 90 W |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | Yes |
| KVM switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 150 mm | 115 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 8.3 kg | 8.56 kg |
| Width | 615 mm | 614 mm |
| Height | 600 mm | 545 mm |
| Depth | 273 mm | 242 mm |
