How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. PD2725U vs UltraFine 32UQ850

BenQ PD2725U vs LG UltraFine 32UQ850

What PD2725U does better (3) and where UltraFine 32UQ850 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

BenQ PD2725U
BenQ · 2023PD2725U
6.9Score
3 advantages≈ $860
vs
LG UltraFine 32UQ850
7.4Score
5 advantages≈ $640
Higher score
5.2Screen7.6
4.1Connectivity5.9
8.0Design & ergonomics4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

PD2725UUltraFine 32UQ850
615 × 600273715 × 598239
PD2725UUltraFine 32UQ850Difference
Height600 mm598 mm+2 mm
Width615 mm715 mm−100 mm
Depth273 mm239 mm+34 mm
Weight8.3 kg7.2 kg+1.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PD2725U better than UltraFine 32UQ850?

  1. Pixel density163 ppi vs 140 ppi+16%
  2. DCI-P3 coverage100% vs 98%+2%
  3. Height adjustment150 mm vs 110 mm+36%

Why is UltraFine 32UQ850 better than PD2725U?

  1. Brightness (typical)250 nits vs 400 nits+60%
  2. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)65 W vs 90 W+38%
  3. Contrast ratio (static)1,200:1 vs 2,000:1+67%
  4. Screen size27″ vs 31.5″+17%
  5. Weight8.3 kg vs 7.2 kg+15%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD2725UBenQ PD2725U≈ $8606.9
Display
Screen size27″31.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density163 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)250 nits400 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,200:12,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
DCI-P3 coverage100%98%
HDRDisplayHDR 400DisplayHDR 400
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)65 W90 W
ThunderboltYes—
KVM switchYesYes
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm110 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelYes—
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight8.3 kg7.2 kg
Width615 mm715 mm
Height600 mm598 mm
Depth273 mm239 mm
Product line—LG UltraFine
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare