How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. PD2725U vs VP2786-4K

BenQ PD2725U vs ViewSonic VP2786-4K

What PD2725U does better (2) and where VP2786-4K wins (3) — every spec side by side.

BenQ PD2725U
BenQ · 2023PD2725U
6.8Score
2 advantages≈ $860
vs
ViewSonic VP2786-4K
ViewSonic · 2022VP2786-4K
8.0Score
3 advantages≈ $1,000
Higher score
5.1Screen7.4
4.0Connectivity6.5
7.9Design & ergonomics5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

PD2725UVP2786-4K
615 × 600273613 × 449.1232
PD2725UVP2786-4KDifference
Height600 mm449.1 mm+150.9 mm
Width615 mm613 mm+2 mm
Depth273 mm232 mm+41 mm
Weight8.3 kg8.3 kg=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PD2725U better than VP2786-4K?

  1. DCI-P3 coverage100% vs 98%+2%
  2. Height adjustment150 mm vs 130 mm+15%

Why is VP2786-4K better than PD2725U?

  1. Brightness (typical)250 nits vs 350 nits+40%
  2. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)65 W vs 90 W+38%
  3. Contrast ratio (static)1,200:1 vs 1,300:1+8%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD2725UBenQ PD2725U≈ $8606.8
ViewSonic VP2786-4KViewSonic VP2786-4K≈ $1,0008.0
Display
Screen size27″27″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density163 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz—
Brightness (typical)250 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,200:11,300:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
Adobe RGB coverage—100%
DCI-P3 coverage100%98%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)—ΔE 2
Colour depth—10 bit
Hardware calibration—Yes
Factory calibrated (report)—Yes
HDRDisplayHDR 400—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)65 W90 W
ThunderboltYes—
KVM switchYes—
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYes—
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes—
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight8.3 kg8.3 kg
Width615 mm613 mm
Height600 mm449 mm
Depth273 mm232 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare