How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. PD3220U vs UltraSharp U3423WE

BenQ PD3220U vs Dell UltraSharp U3423WE

What PD3220U does better (2) and where UltraSharp U3423WE wins (3) — every spec side by side.

BenQ PD3220U
BenQ · 2019PD3220U
5.3Score
2 advantages≈ $990
vs
Dell UltraSharp U3423WE
Dell · 2022UltraSharp U3423WE
6.9Score
3 advantages≈ $760
Higher score
4.8Screen4.0
4.4Colour accuracy7.6
7.5Connectivity5.6
3.6Design & ergonomics5.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

PD3220UUltraSharp U3423WE
715 × 628186813 × 393237
PD3220UUltraSharp U3423WEDifference
Height628 mm393 mm+235 mm
Width715 mm813 mm−98 mm
Depth186 mm237 mm−51 mm
Weight10.4 kg11.4 kg−1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PD3220U better than UltraSharp U3423WE?

  1. Pixel density140 ppi vs 109 ppi+28%
  2. Weight10.4 kg vs 11.44 kg+10%

Why is UltraSharp U3423WE better than PD3220U?

  1. Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 2,000:12×
  2. DCI-P3 coverage95% vs 98%+3%
  3. Screen size31.5″ vs 34″+8%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD3220UBenQ PD3220U≈ $9905.3
Display
Screen size31.5″34″
Resolution3840 × 21603440 × 1440
Resolution class4K UHDUltrawide QHD
Pixel density140 ppi109 ppi
Aspect ratio16:921:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Brightness (typical)300 nits300 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:12,000:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Curved screen—Yes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
DCI-P3 coverage95%98%
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)—90 W
ThunderboltYes—
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Ethernet (RJ45)—Yes
Built-in speakersYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—150 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
Swivel—Yes
VESA mount—100 × 100 mm
Weight10.4 kg11.44 kg
Width715 mm813 mm
Height628 mm393 mm
Depth186 mm237 mm
Product line—Dell UltraSharp
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare