- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD3420Q vs SW270C
BenQ PD3420Q vs BenQ SW270C
What PD3420Q does better (3) and where SW270C wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD3420QSW270C
| PD3420Q | SW270C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 445 mm | 626 mm | −181 mm |
| Width | 826 mm | 614 mm | +212 mm |
| Depth | 244 mm | 335 mm | −91 mm |
| Weight | 9.3 kg | 9.8 kg | −0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD3420Q better than SW270C?
- Brightness (typical)350 nits vs 300 nits+17%
- Screen size34″ vs 27″+26%
- Weight9.3 kg vs 9.8 kg+5%
Why is SW270C better than PD3420Q?
SW270C has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 34″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 3440 × 1440 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Ultrawide QHD | QHD / 2.5K |
| Pixel density | 109 ppi | 109 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 21:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 350 nits | 300 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Adobe RGB coverage | — | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 98% | 97% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 150 mm | 150 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | No | No |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | — | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 9.3 kg | 9.8 kg |
| Width | 826 mm | 614 mm |
| Height | 445 mm | 626 mm |
| Depth | 244 mm | 335 mm |
| Product line | BenQ DesignVue | BenQ PhotoVue |
