How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. SW270C vs ColorEdge CS2731

BenQ SW270C vs EIZO ColorEdge CS2731

What SW270C does better (3) and where ColorEdge CS2731 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

BenQ SW270C
BenQ · 2019SW270C
4.3Score
3 advantages≈ $1,150
vs
EIZO ColorEdge CS2731
EIZO · 2019ColorEdge CS2731
5.8Score
4 advantages≈ $860
Higher score
2.9Screen3.5
5.0Colour accuracy7.4
4.0Design & ergonomics7.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

SW270CColorEdge CS2731
614 × 626335638 × 404.1265
SW270CColorEdge CS2731Difference
Height626 mm404.1 mm+221.9 mm
Width614 mm638 mm−24 mm
Depth335 mm265 mm+70 mm
Weight9.8 kg10.1 kg−0.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is SW270C better than ColorEdge CS2731?

  1. Response time5 ms vs 10 ms2×
  2. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  3. Weight9.8 kg vs 10.1 kg+3%

Why is ColorEdge CS2731 better than SW270C?

  1. Pivot (portrait rotation)No · SW270C: Yes
  2. Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 350 nits+17%
  3. DCI-P3 coverage97% vs 99%+2%
  4. Height adjustment150 mm vs 155 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ SW270CBenQ SW270C≈ $1,1504.3
Display
Screen size27″27″
Resolution2560 × 14402560 × 1440
Resolution classQHD / 2.5KQHD / 2.5K
Pixel density109 ppi109 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz61 Hz
Brightness (typical)300 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,000:1
Response time5 ms10 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
Adobe RGB coverage99%99%
DCI-P3 coverage97%99%
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDRHDR10—
Uniformity compensation—Yes
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)—Yes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)—60 W
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakers—No
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm155 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)NoYes
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight9.8 kg10.1 kg
Width614 mm638 mm
Height626 mm404 mm
Depth335 mm265 mm
Product lineBenQ PhotoVue—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare