- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- SW270C vs UltraFine 40WP95C
BenQ SW270C vs LG UltraFine 40WP95C
What SW270C does better (2) and where UltraFine 40WP95C wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.9Screen6.1
4.0Design & ergonomics2.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
SW270CUltraFine 40WP95C
| SW270C | UltraFine 40WP95C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 626 mm | 615 mm | +11 mm |
| Width | 614 mm | 947 mm | −333 mm |
| Depth | 335 mm | 283 mm | +52 mm |
| Weight | 9.8 kg | 12.3 kg | −2.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SW270C better than UltraFine 40WP95C?
- Height adjustment150 mm vs 110 mm+36%
- Weight9.8 kg vs 12.3 kg+26%
Why is UltraFine 40WP95C better than SW270C?
- Pixel density109 ppi vs 140 ppi+28%
- Screen size27″ vs 39.7″+47%
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 72 Hz+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 39.7″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 5120 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | QHD / 2.5K | 5K |
| Pixel density | 109 ppi | 140 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 72 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Curved screen | — | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Adobe RGB coverage | 99% | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 97% | 98% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | — |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | — | 96 W |
| Thunderbolt | — | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | — | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 150 mm | 110 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | No | — |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | — |
| Weight | 9.8 kg | 12.3 kg |
| Width | 614 mm | 947 mm |
| Height | 626 mm | 615 mm |
| Depth | 335 mm | 283 mm |
| Product line | BenQ PhotoVue | — |
