How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. SW270C vs VP2786-4K

BenQ SW270C vs ViewSonic VP2786-4K

What SW270C does better (1) and where VP2786-4K wins (4) — every spec side by side.

BenQ SW270C
BenQ · 2019SW270C
4.3Score
1 advantage≈ $1,150
vs
ViewSonic VP2786-4K
ViewSonic · 2022VP2786-4K
8.0Score
4 advantages≈ $1,000
Higher score
2.9Screen7.5
5.0Colour accuracy7.2
4.0Design & ergonomics5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

SW270CVP2786-4K
614 × 626335613 × 449.1232
SW270CVP2786-4KDifference
Height626 mm449.1 mm+176.9 mm
Width614 mm613 mm+1 mm
Depth335 mm232 mm+103 mm
Weight9.8 kg8.3 kg+1.5 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is SW270C better than VP2786-4K?

  1. Height adjustment150 mm vs 130 mm+15%

Why is VP2786-4K better than SW270C?

  1. Pixel density109 ppi vs 163 ppi+50%
  2. Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 350 nits+17%
  3. Contrast ratio (static)1,000:1 vs 1,300:1+30%
  4. Weight9.8 kg vs 8.3 kg+18%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ SW270CBenQ SW270C≈ $1,1504.3
ViewSonic VP2786-4KViewSonic VP2786-4K≈ $1,0008.0
Display
Screen size27″27″
Resolution2560 × 14403840 × 2160
Resolution classQHD / 2.5K4K UHD
Pixel density109 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeIPSIPS
Refresh rate60 Hz—
Brightness (typical)300 nits350 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,000:11,300:1
Response time5 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%—
Adobe RGB coverage99%100%
DCI-P3 coverage97%98%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)—ΔE 2
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
Hardware calibration—Yes
Factory calibrated (report)—Yes
HDRHDR10—
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)—Yes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)—90 W
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYes—
Built-in speakers—Yes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment150 mm130 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)No—
SwivelYesYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm—
Weight9.8 kg8.3 kg
Width614 mm613 mm
Height626 mm449 mm
Depth335 mm232 mm
Product lineBenQ PhotoVue—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare