- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- SW272QN vs SW272U
BenQ SW272QN vs BenQ SW272U
What SW272QN does better (1) and where SW272U wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
SW272QNSW272U
| SW272QN | SW272U | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 592 mm | 592 mm | = |
| Width | 614 mm | 614 mm | = |
| Depth | 274 mm | 274 mm | = |
| Weight | 8.3 kg | 8.6 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SW272QN better than SW272U?
- Weight8.3 kg vs 8.6 kg+4%
Why is SW272U better than SW272QN?
- Pixel density109 ppi vs 163 ppi+50%
- Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 400 nits+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | QHD / 2.5K | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 109 ppi | 163 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 300 nits | 400 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Adobe RGB coverage | 100% | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99% | 99% |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 90 W | 90 W |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | — |
| KVM switch | Yes | — |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 140 mm | 140 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | Yes |
| Swivel | Yes | Yes |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 8.3 kg | 8.6 kg |
| Width | 614 mm | 614 mm |
| Height | 592 mm | 592 mm |
| Depth | 274 mm | 274 mm |
