- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- One 13 Touch vs Pen Display 16
Wacom One 13 Touch vs Xencelabs Pen Display 16
What One 13 Touch does better (1) and where Pen Display 16 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Design & ergonomics7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
One 13 TouchPen Display 16
| One 13 Touch | Pen Display 16 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 222 mm | 259 mm | −37 mm |
| Width | 336 mm | 410 mm | −74 mm |
| Depth | 12 mm | 12 mm | = |
| Weight | 0.9 kg | 1.2 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is One 13 Touch better than Pen Display 16?
- Weight0.9 kg vs 1.21 kg+34%
Why is Pen Display 16 better than One 13 Touch?
- Pressure levels4,096 vs 8,1922×
- Active area (surface)426 cm² vs 666 cm²+56%
- Screen size12.9″ vs 15.5″+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12.9″ | 15.5″ |
| Resolution | — | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | — | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | — | 259 ppi |
| Panel type | — | OLED |
| Brightness (typical) | — | 300 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | — | 100,000:1 |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | — | Yes |
| Pen & controls | ||
| Pressure levels | 4,096 | 8,192 |
| Tilt recognition | — | ±60° |
| Active area | 294 × 145 mm | 344.2 × 193.6 mm |
| Active area width | 294 mm | 344 mm |
| Active area height | 145 mm | 194 mm |
| Active area (surface) | 426 cm² | 666 cm² |
| Pen resolution | — | 5,080 lpi |
| Battery-free pen | — | Yes |
| Pen with eraser | — | Yes |
| Multi-touch | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | — | Yes |
| Wireless connection | — | No |
| Compatibility | — | Windows, macOS |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Weight | 0.9 kg | 1.21 kg |
| Width | 336 mm | 410 mm |
| Height | 222 mm | 259 mm |
| Depth | 12 mm | 12 mm |
