18% cheaper ≈ $2,500
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 138 ppi
- Panel type Mini-LED (IPS) vs IPS
- HDR DisplayHDR 1000 vs HDR10
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Response time 6 ms vs 5 ms
Alternatives to Asus ProArt PA32UCG
10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the ProArt PA32UCG — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the ProArt PA32UCG
13% pricier ≈ $3,400
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 1,000 nits
- Peak brightness (HDR) 500 nits vs 1,600 nits
20% cheaper ≈ $2,450
- Pixel density 164 ppi vs 138 ppi
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 94 W vs 60 W
- Weight 9.7 kg vs 14.64 kg
- Brightness (typical) 500 nits vs 1,000 nits
- Response time 13 ms vs 5 ms
23% cheaper ≈ $2,350
- Contrast ratio (static) 20,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Rec. 2020 coverage 89% vs 85%
- Weight 14 kg vs 14.64 kg
- Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 1,000 nits
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
26% pricier ≈ $3,800
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 60 W
- Pixel density 223 ppi vs 138 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 2,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 1,000 nits
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 3
32% pricier ≈ $4,000
- Panel type Mini-LED (IPS) vs IPS
- HDR DisplayHDR 1000 vs HDR10
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,300:1 vs 1,000:1
- Adobe RGB coverage 93% vs 99.5%
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
30% cheaper ≈ $2,100
- Pixel density 164 ppi vs 138 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,000,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
- Brightness (typical) 200 nits vs 1,000 nits
- Peak brightness (HDR) 350 nits vs 1,600 nits
42% cheaper ≈ $1,750
- Pixel density 163 ppi vs 138 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,300:1 vs 1,000:1
- Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 1,000 nits
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 120 Hz
51% pricier ≈ $4,600
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 94 W vs 60 W
- Pixel density 152 ppi vs 138 ppi
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,800:1 vs 1,000:1
- Brightness (typical) 500 nits vs 1,000 nits
- Response time 15 ms vs 5 ms
17% cheaper ≈ $2,500
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 60 W
- Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 1,000:1
- Response time 0.03 ms vs 5 ms
- Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 1,000 nits
- Adobe RGB coverage 94% vs 99.5%