How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Displays & pen tablets
  3. ViewSonic VP3276T-4K
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to ViewSonic VP3276T-4K

10 colour-accurate monitors at a similar price that compete with the VP3276T-4K — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Alternatives to the VP3276T-4K

ViewSonic VP2788-5K
1
ViewSonic · 2026VP2788-5K
7.3
5% pricier ≈ $840
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 138 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 500 nits vs 400 nits
  • Weight 6.4 kg vs 7.8 kg
  • Response time 14 ms vs 5 ms
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
BenQ SW272QN
2
BenQ · 2026SW272QN
8.2
9% pricier ≈ $870
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 15 W
  • Height adjustment 140 mm vs 120 mm
  • Pixel density 109 ppi vs 138 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 400 nits
BenQ MA320UG
3
BenQ · 2026MA320UG
8.7
15% pricier ≈ $920
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 15 W
  • Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 400 nits
  • Anti-glare / matte screen
  • Weight 9.64 kg vs 7.8 kg
BenQ PD2732U
4
BenQ · 2026PD2732U
8.6
12% pricier ≈ $900
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 90 W vs 15 W
  • Pixel density 163 ppi vs 138 ppi
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
Lenovo ThinkVision P32ud-40
5
Lenovo · 2026ThinkVision P32ud-40
7.7
36% cheaper ≈ $510
  • Response time 1 ms vs 5 ms
  • Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Height adjustment 155 mm vs 120 mm
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
  • Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 400 nits
Lenovo ThinkVision P27ud-40
6
Lenovo · 2026ThinkVision P27ud-40
9.5
21% cheaper ≈ $630
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 140 W vs 15 W
  • Pixel density 163 ppi vs 138 ppi
  • Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
  • Brightness (typical) 350 nits vs 400 nits
Asus ProArt PA279CDV
7
Asus · 2026ProArt PA279CDV
9.4
25% pricier ≈ $1,000
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 15 W
  • Pixel density 166 ppi vs 138 ppi
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • Brightness (typical) 250 nits vs 400 nits
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
BenQ MA270S
8
BenQ · 2026MA270S
9.2
35% pricier ≈ $1,100
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 15 W
  • Pixel density 218 ppi vs 138 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 450 nits vs 400 nits
  • Anti-glare / matte screen
  • Screen size 27″ vs 32″
Asus ProArt PA27UCGE
9
Asus · 2025ProArt PA27UCGE
9.2
6% cheaper ≈ $750
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 15 W
  • Pixel density 163 ppi vs 138 ppi
  • Brightness (typical) 600 nits vs 400 nits
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • Screen size 27″ vs 32″
Asus ProArt PA329CDV
10
Asus · 2026ProArt PA329CDV
9.1
47% pricier ≈ $1,200
  • USB-C charging (Power Delivery) 96 W vs 15 W
  • Contrast ratio (static) 1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1
  • Response time 0.1 ms vs 5 ms
  • Brightness (typical) 300 nits vs 400 nits
  • HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare