Apple Studio Display (2026) vs Asus ProArt PA32KCX

What Studio Display (2026) does better (0) and where ProArt PA32KCX wins (3) — every spec side by side.

9.6Score

0 advantages≈ $1,600

Higher score

7.2Score

3 advantages≈ $10,000

9.6Screen9.5

9.1Connectivity8.6

Why is Studio Display (2026) better than ProArt PA32KCX?

Studio Display (2026) has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Only differences	Apple Studio Display (2026)≈ $1,6009.6	Asus ProArt PA32KCX≈ $10,0007.2
Display
Screen size	27″	32″
Resolution	5120 × 2880	7680 × 4320
Resolution class	5K	8K
Pixel density	218 ppi	275 ppi
Aspect ratio	16:9	16:9
Panel type	IPS	IPS
Refresh rate	60 Hz	60 Hz
Brightness (typical)	600 nits	1,000 nits
Peak brightness (HDR)	—	1,200 nits
Contrast ratio (static)	—	1,000:1
Response time	—	5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screen	Yes	Yes
Colour
sRGB coverage	—	99%
Adobe RGB coverage	—	95%
DCI-P3 coverage	—	97%
Colour accuracy (ΔE, claimed)	—	ΔE 1
Colour depth	10 bit	10 bit
Hardware calibration	—	Yes
HDR	—	HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)	Yes	Yes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	96 W	96 W
Thunderbolt	Yes	Yes
KVM switch	—	Yes
HDMI inputs	—	2
DisplayPort inputs	—	1
USB hub	—	Yes
Daisy chain (DP MST)	Yes	—
Built-in speakers	Yes	Yes
Built-in webcam	Yes	—
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment	—	100 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)	—	Yes
Swivel	—	Yes
VESA mount	100 × 100 mm	100 × 100 mm
Weight	—	14.1 kg
Width	—	727 mm
Height	—	601 mm
Depth	—	245 mm
Product line	—	ASUS ProArt