How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32UCDMR vs MA320UG

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR vs BenQ MA320UG

What ProArt PA32UCDMR does better (6) and where MA320UG wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR
Asus · 2026ProArt PA32UCDMR
9.3Score
6 advantages≈ $1,550
Higher score
vs
BenQ MA320UG
BenQ · 2026MA320UG
8.7Score
1 advantage≈ $920
9.7Screen8.0
9.6Colour accuracy6.7
9.2Connectivity8.8
2.6Design & ergonomics6.2

Why is ProArt PA32UCDMR better than MA320UG?

  1. Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:1 vs 2,000:1750×
  2. Response time0.1 ms vs 5 ms50×
  3. Panel typeOLED vs IPS
  4. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
  5. Anti-glare / matte screenYes · MA320UG: No
  6. HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400 vs DisplayHDR 400

Why is MA320UG better than ProArt PA32UCDMR?

  1. SwivelNo · ProArt PA32UCDMR: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ MA320UGBenQ MA320UG≈ $9208.7
Display
Screen size31.5″31.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density140 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeOLEDIPS
Refresh rate240 Hz120 Hz
Brightness (typical)—450 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:12,000:1
Response time0.1 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesNo
Colour
sRGB coverage100%99%
DCI-P3 coverage99%98%
Rec. 2020 coverage99%—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400DisplayHDR 400
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W96 W
ThunderboltYesYes
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs1—
USB hubYesYes
Daisy chain (DP MST)—Yes
Built-in speakers—Yes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—150 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelNoYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight—9.64 kg
Width—715 mm
Height—631 mm
Depth—230 mm
Product lineASUS ProArtBenQ MA
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare