How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32UCDMR vs PD3226G

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR vs BenQ PD3226G

What ProArt PA32UCDMR does better (8) and where PD3226G wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR
Asus · 2026ProArt PA32UCDMR
9.3Score
8 advantages≈ $1,550
Higher score
vs
BenQ PD3226G
BenQ · 2025PD3226G
7.9Score
1 advantage≈ $1,150
9.7Screen8.9
9.6Colour accuracy6.4
9.2Connectivity4.9
2.6Design & ergonomics6.2

Why is ProArt PA32UCDMR better than PD3226G?

  1. Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:1 vs 1,200:11,250×
  2. Response time0.1 ms vs 1 ms10×
  3. Panel typeOLED vs IPS
  4. HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400 vs DisplayHDR 400
  5. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  6. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 90 W+7%
  7. DCI-P3 coverage99% vs 95%+4%
  8. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 144 Hz+67%

Why is PD3226G better than ProArt PA32UCDMR?

  1. SwivelNo · ProArt PA32UCDMR: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ PD3226GBenQ PD3226G≈ $1,1507.9
Display
Screen size31.5″31.5″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density140 ppi140 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeOLEDIPS
Refresh rate240 Hz144 Hz
Brightness (typical)—400 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:11,200:1
Response time0.1 ms1 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
DCI-P3 coverage99%95%
Rec. 2020 coverage99%—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400DisplayHDR 400
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W90 W
ThunderboltYesYes
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Daisy chain (DP MST)—Yes
Built-in speakers—Yes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—150 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelNoYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight—9.7 kg
Width—714 mm
Height—636 mm
Depth—242 mm
Product lineASUS ProArtBenQ PD
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare