How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32UCDMR vs SW272QN

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR vs BenQ SW272QN

What ProArt PA32UCDMR does better (8) and where SW272QN wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR
Asus · 2026ProArt PA32UCDMR
9.3Score
8 advantages≈ $1,550
Higher score
vs
BenQ SW272QN
BenQ · 2026SW272QN
8.2Score
1 advantage≈ $870
9.7Screen2.8
9.6Colour accuracy9.7
9.2Connectivity5.7
2.6Design & ergonomics6.6

Why is ProArt PA32UCDMR better than SW272QN?

  1. Pixel density140 ppi vs 109 ppi+28%
  2. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 60 Hz4×
  3. Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:1 vs 1,000:11,500×
  4. Response time0.1 ms vs 5 ms50×
  5. Panel typeOLED vs IPS
  6. HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400 vs HDR10
  7. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 90 W+7%
  8. Screen size31.5″ vs 27″+17%

Why is SW272QN better than ProArt PA32UCDMR?

  1. SwivelNo · ProArt PA32UCDMR: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ SW272QNBenQ SW272QN≈ $8708.2
Display
Screen size31.5″27″
Resolution3840 × 21602560 × 1440
Resolution class4K UHDQHD / 2.5K
Pixel density140 ppi109 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeOLEDIPS
Refresh rate240 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)—300 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:11,000:1
Response time0.1 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%—
Adobe RGB coverage—100%
DCI-P3 coverage99%99%
Rec. 2020 coverage99%—
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W90 W
ThunderboltYesYes
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—140 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelNoYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight—8.3 kg
Width—614 mm
Height—592 mm
Depth—274 mm
Product lineASUS ProArt—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare