How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32UCDMR vs SW272U

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR vs BenQ SW272U

What ProArt PA32UCDMR does better (7) and where SW272U wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR
Asus · 2026ProArt PA32UCDMR
9.3Score
7 advantages≈ $1,550
Higher score
vs
BenQ SW272U
BenQ · 2024SW272U
8.3Score
2 advantages≈ $1,350
9.7Screen7.1
9.6Colour accuracy7.1
9.2Connectivity6.2
2.6Design & ergonomics6.3

Why is ProArt PA32UCDMR better than SW272U?

  1. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 60 Hz4×
  2. Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:1 vs 1,000:11,500×
  3. Response time0.1 ms vs 5 ms50×
  4. Panel typeOLED vs IPS
  5. HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400 vs HDR10
  6. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 90 W+7%
  7. Screen size31.5″ vs 27″+17%

Why is SW272U better than ProArt PA32UCDMR?

  1. Pixel density140 ppi vs 163 ppi+16%
  2. SwivelNo · ProArt PA32UCDMR: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ SW272UBenQ SW272U≈ $1,3508.3
Display
Screen size31.5″27″
Resolution3840 × 21603840 × 2160
Resolution class4K UHD4K UHD
Pixel density140 ppi163 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:9
Panel typeOLEDIPS
Refresh rate240 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)—400 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:11,000:1
Response time0.1 ms5 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
Adobe RGB coverage—99%
DCI-P3 coverage99%99%
Rec. 2020 coverage99%—
Colour depth10 bit—
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400HDR10
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W90 W
ThunderboltYes—
HDMI inputs22
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—140 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelNoYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight—8.6 kg
Width—614 mm
Height—592 mm
Depth—274 mm
Product lineASUS ProArt—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare