How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32UCDMR vs ColorEdge CG2400SV

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR vs EIZO ColorEdge CG2400SV

What ProArt PA32UCDMR does better (8) and where ColorEdge CG2400SV wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR
Asus · 2026ProArt PA32UCDMR
9.3Score
8 advantages≈ $1,550
Higher score
vs
EIZO ColorEdge CG2400SV
EIZO · 2025ColorEdge CG2400SV
6.2Score
1 advantage≈ $2,150
9.7Screen3.4
9.6Colour accuracy5.9
9.2Connectivity3.8
2.6Design & ergonomics8.7

Why is ProArt PA32UCDMR better than ColorEdge CG2400SV?

  1. Pixel density140 ppi vs 94 ppi+49%
  2. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 61 Hz3.9×
  3. Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:1 vs 1,800:1833.3×
  4. Response time0.1 ms vs 11 ms110×
  5. Panel typeOLED vs IPS
  6. HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400 vs HDR10
  7. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  8. Screen size31.5″ vs 24.1″+31%

Why is ColorEdge CG2400SV better than ProArt PA32UCDMR?

  1. SwivelNo · ProArt PA32UCDMR: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size31.5″24.1″
Resolution3840 × 21601920 × 1200
Resolution class4K UHDFull HD
Pixel density140 ppi94 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:10
Panel typeOLEDIPS
Refresh rate240 Hz61 Hz
Brightness (typical)—400 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:11,800:1
Response time0.1 ms11 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%—
Adobe RGB coverage—99%
DCI-P3 coverage99%98%
Rec. 2020 coverage99%—
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
Hardware calibration—Yes
Built-in calibration sensor—Yes
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400HDR10
Uniformity compensation—Yes
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)Yes—
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W—
ThunderboltYes—
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakers—No
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—155 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelNoYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight—8.5 kg
Width—554 mm
Height—408 mm
Depth—245 mm
Product lineASUS ProArtEIZO ColorEdge
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare