How we score Blog Advertise
  1. opendesign.foundation
  2. Compare
  3. ProArt PA32UCDMR vs ColorEdge CS2400S

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR vs EIZO ColorEdge CS2400S

What ProArt PA32UCDMR does better (8) and where ColorEdge CS2400S wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Asus ProArt PA32UCDMR
Asus · 2026ProArt PA32UCDMR
9.3Score
8 advantages≈ $1,550
Higher score
vs
EIZO ColorEdge CS2400S
EIZO · 2023ColorEdge CS2400S
7.1Score
1 advantage≈ $560
9.7Screen3.2
9.6Colour accuracy8.2
9.2Connectivity3.2
2.6Design & ergonomics9.2

Why is ProArt PA32UCDMR better than ColorEdge CS2400S?

  1. Pixel density140 ppi vs 94 ppi+49%
  2. Refresh rate240 Hz vs 60 Hz4×
  3. Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:1 vs 1,350:11,111.1×
  4. Response time0.1 ms vs 19 ms190×
  5. USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W vs 70 W+37%
  6. Panel typeOLED vs IPS
  7. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  8. Screen size31.5″ vs 24.1″+31%

Why is ColorEdge CS2400S better than ProArt PA32UCDMR?

  1. SwivelNo · ProArt PA32UCDMR: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Display
Screen size31.5″24.1″
Resolution3840 × 21601920 × 1200
Resolution class4K UHDFull HD
Pixel density140 ppi94 ppi
Aspect ratio16:916:10
Panel typeOLEDIPS
Refresh rate240 Hz60 Hz
Brightness (typical)—410 nits
Contrast ratio (static)1,500,000:11,350:1
Response time0.1 ms19 ms
Anti-glare / matte screenYesYes
Colour
sRGB coverage100%100%
Adobe RGB coverage—99%
DCI-P3 coverage99%99%
Rec. 2020 coverage99%98%
Colour depth10 bit10 bit
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400—
Uniformity compensation—Yes
Connectivity
USB-C video input (one cable)YesYes
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)96 W70 W
ThunderboltYes—
KVM switch—Yes
HDMI inputs21
DisplayPort inputs11
USB hubYesYes
Built-in speakers—No
Design & ergonomics
Height adjustment—155 mm
Pivot (portrait rotation)YesYes
SwivelNoYes
VESA mount100 × 100 mm100 × 100 mm
Weight—8.2 kg
Width—554 mm
Height—396 mm
Depth—245 mm
Product lineASUS ProArtEIZO ColorEdge
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare