- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- PD3220U vs SW270C
BenQ PD3220U vs BenQ SW270C
What PD3220U does better (3) and where SW270C wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
PD3220USW270C
| PD3220U | SW270C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 628 mm | 626 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 715 mm | 614 mm | +101 mm |
| Depth | 186 mm | 335 mm | −149 mm |
| Weight | 10.4 kg | 9.8 kg | +0.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PD3220U better than SW270C?
- Pixel density140 ppi vs 109 ppi+28%
- Pivot (portrait rotation)Yes · SW270C: No
- Screen size31.5″ vs 27″+17%
Why is SW270C better than PD3220U?
- DCI-P3 coverage95% vs 97%+2%
- Weight10.4 kg vs 9.8 kg+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 31.5″ | 27″ |
| Resolution | 3840 × 2160 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | 4K UHD | QHD / 2.5K |
| Pixel density | 140 ppi | 109 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 300 nits | 300 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Adobe RGB coverage | — | 99% |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 95% | 97% |
| Colour depth | 10 bit | 10 bit |
| HDR | HDR10 | HDR10 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | — |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | — |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | Yes | — |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | — | 150 mm |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | No |
| Swivel | — | Yes |
| VESA mount | — | 100 × 100 mm |
| Weight | 10.4 kg | 9.8 kg |
| Width | 715 mm | 614 mm |
| Height | 628 mm | 626 mm |
| Depth | 186 mm | 335 mm |
| Product line | — | BenQ PhotoVue |
