- opendesign.foundation
- Compare
- SW272QN vs UltraSharp U4323QE
BenQ SW272QN vs Dell UltraSharp U4323QE
What SW272QN does better (2) and where UltraSharp U4323QE wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.8Screen4.4
5.7Connectivity8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
SW272QNUltraSharp U4323QE
| SW272QN | UltraSharp U4323QE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 592 mm | 655 mm | −63 mm |
| Width | 614 mm | 967 mm | −353 mm |
| Depth | 274 mm | 256 mm | +18 mm |
| Weight | 8.3 kg | 18.6 kg | −10.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SW272QN better than UltraSharp U4323QE?
- Pixel density109 ppi vs 104 ppi+5%
- Weight8.3 kg vs 18.55 kg2.2×
Why is UltraSharp U4323QE better than SW272QN?
- DisplayPort inputs1 vs 22×
- Brightness (typical)300 nits vs 350 nits+17%
- Screen size27″ vs 42.5″+57%
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 76 Hz+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 27″ | 42.5″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1440 | 3840 × 2160 |
| Resolution class | QHD / 2.5K | 4K UHD |
| Pixel density | 109 ppi | 104 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 76 Hz |
| Brightness (typical) | 300 nits | 350 nits |
| Contrast ratio (static) | 1,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Response time | 5 ms | 5 ms |
| Anti-glare / matte screen | Yes | Yes |
| Colour | ||
| sRGB coverage | — | 95% |
| Adobe RGB coverage | 100% | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 99% | — |
| HDR | HDR10 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C video input (one cable) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | 90 W | 90 W |
| Thunderbolt | Yes | — |
| KVM switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB hub | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in speakers | — | Yes |
| Design & ergonomics | ||
| Height adjustment | 140 mm | — |
| Pivot (portrait rotation) | Yes | — |
| Swivel | Yes | — |
| VESA mount | 100 × 100 mm | — |
| Weight | 8.3 kg | 18.55 kg |
| Width | 614 mm | 967 mm |
| Height | 592 mm | 655 mm |
| Depth | 274 mm | 256 mm |
